Population genomics = Thousands and thousands of romance novels in one data set

http://www.kenniskennis.com/site/sculptures/Neanderthal%20Spy/

Genetics truly is the language of love

A key aspect of any decently lurid romantic novel is opposition. One lover is rich, the other poor. One is from the north, the other is from the south. One is demure, the other is brazen. The families don’t approve, secrecy is a must, and the threat of disclosure ever looms. The books shall have titles like “My Reluctant Pirate Lord”, “To Capture a Viscount”, or “Ancient gene flow from early modern humans into Eastern Neanderthals” (population genomic article titles tend to lack some of the allure of a proper romance novel, but make up for it with better equations).

The latter tale of forbidden loves was just published in the journal Nature, and it recounts about 100,000 years of romance. Figuring a generation every twenty years and that their tale covers Africa and Eurasia, this article covers a lot passion. And just like a romance novel- despite its basis in genetics and statistics- population genomics delves into the love borne of contradictions.

The elements of opposition in a population genetic story are, of course, genetic differences. Though dairy maid vs. marquise is more standard novel fare, genetics must focus on differences in our DNA. Fortunately there is plenty of genetic variation to assess, though much is undetectable without having your own Illumina MiSeq to sequence a genome or two. As discussed here, mitochondrial DNA is often used to trace relationships between groups of people. These mitochondrial mutations probably have little if any effect on our physiology. However by assaying these mutations in many different groups of people, we can trace how different populations flowed over time across the lands.

Continue Reading

The Galactic Midi-Chlorian Genome Project

starchild

The prophet Elisha vs Yoda: who had the highest midi-chlorian count?

Some of us, for whom the first Star Wars movies were a significant aspect of their youth, may have made more than a few furtive efforts during school trying to move objects using the Force. Luke could juggle swamp rocks, and Yoda could lift an X-wing. Surely I could move a pencil, especially during the bleaker moments of study hall, when time had ceased operating? But regrettably, no; I could not. Still, it was preferable to school work.

Yoda didn’t invent these exercises in telekinesis. It’s written in the Old Testament that Elisha, who was a disciple of Elijah, had a similar skill. The story is thus: Elisha was out one day with a guild of prophets, “sons of the prophets”, they were called.

An aside: a ‘guild of prophets’ is a funny organization to consider. Were there unlicensed prophets operating outside of the guild, recklessly forecasting the future without a single credential to their name? I like to imagine this band as a group of young guys for whom ‘I knew you were going to say that’ was their most common retort. Alas, unfortunately the term likely just refers to a group of priests.

Anyways, one of these prophets was chopping on a log and his axehead flew off the handle into the river. He immediately exclaimed, “Oh no, it was borrowed!” One must appreciate that this inconsequential detail (in the long run, at least) has been preserved for almost three thousand years. It suggests that, despite all our progress, loaning your tools to the neighbor has always been, and likely will always be, a fool’s practice. Fortunately Elisha was there, and throwing a stick into the river, he caused the axe to float to the surface. Yoda just needed to stretch out his hand to make Luke’s X-wing rise from the waters, but he was also holding a stick in the scene. I’m sure there is a significance in the conservation of the “stick” motif. For that matter, Yoda was a member of a guild of prophets, and his guild wore robes too. The similarities are striking, though before we declare that Yoda=Elisha we should acknowledge that there does not appear to be a Star Wars mirror to the biblical story of Elisha siccing two bears onto a pack of kids that were mocking his baldness.

Elisha’s miracle was granted via “gratia gratis data”, grace freely given to someone such that they can help others. Yoda explained his power differently, his came from ‘The Force’.

Presumably Elisha did this this miracle (the floating axe, not the one with the angry bears) via the grace of God, specifically through what’s termed in the church as “gratia gratis data”, grace freely given to someone such that they can help others. Yoda explained his power differently, his came from ‘The Force’. What the Force actually was… well that was a mystery. As is grace, for that matter.

Continue Reading

Surveyor-General of Genomes and Genes

surveyor general

Applications for the position are currently being accepted (not really)

Small things can become big things. Aeneas, fleeing from the destruction of his home town of Troy, fell in love with Dido, the queen of Carthage. That was a small thing, people fall in love all the time. Even I fell in love with Dido when, in her despair at finding that Aeneas was abandoning her to go found Rome, “Sleep fled her eyes, as quiet fled her mind. /Despair, and rage, and love divide her heart”.

That shouldn’t happen to anyone.

The news of their love affair was spread across the sea by Fama, the Roman goddess of gossip, rumor and fame. The bible says we’re supposed to love our enemies (and Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young say we’re supposed to love the one we’re with). The Aeneas and Dido affair was a case of prescient loving one’s enemy, for news of their aborted tryst, carried across the waters by Fama, led ultimately to the Punic wars (according to legend, at least). Virgil described Fama as, “at the start a small and cowardly thing, it soon puffs itself up, and walking upon the ground, buries its head in the clouds”. If you’ve ever read a copy of People’s magazine or Hello!, you know exactly what he meant about something small and inconsequential taking on giant proportions.

Surveys are collections of lots of small bits of information. William the Conqueror’s Domesday Book was one. The human genome project is another.

It’s not only gossip that can grow from the small to the large. Surveys are collections of many small facts and items of information; individually these facts are often inconsequential, but the survey may be greater than the sum of its parts. One of the first great surveys of public information was the Domesday survey, ordered by William the Conqueror of his new holdings in England. To make sure taxes and levies were correctly allotted, he ordered a survey of all the sources of income of the lords and counties. This included big things as well as the lesser. A coppice is a stand of small trees that is cut back periodically; the wood was used for baskets and barrels, poles and pikes, and whatever other uses one had of pliable wood before the advent of plastic and sheet metal, and in Domesday Book these are called silvia minutia, or ‘tiny woods’. A single coppice is not worth very much, but a single hamburger isn’t worth very much either, and yet McDonalds is worth over 100 billion dollars. Size may not matter, but numbers may. William had a lot of coppices, or at least, a number he felt was well worth counting.

A genomic sequence is another survey, with three billion entries per person. Even a simple survey of just a person’s most variable bits of their genome (since we are all 99.9% identical at the level of our genetic sequence) often has a million entries. Each entry in these surveys is a single base, just an A, C, T or G. Pretty small, and not very important.

Continue Reading