Genetics truly is the language of love
A key aspect of any decently lurid romantic novel is opposition. One lover is rich, the other poor. One is from the north, the other is from the south. One is demure, the other is brazen. The families don’t approve, secrecy is a must, and the threat of disclosure ever looms. The books shall have titles like “My Reluctant Pirate Lord”, “To Capture a Viscount”, or “Ancient gene flow from early modern humans into Eastern Neanderthals” (population genomic article titles tend to lack some of the allure of a proper romance novel, but make up for it with better equations).
The latter tale of forbidden loves was just published in the journal Nature, and it recounts about 100,000 years of romance. Figuring a generation every twenty years and that their tale covers Africa and Eurasia, this article covers a lot passion. And just like a romance novel- despite its basis in genetics and statistics- population genomics delves into the love borne of contradictions.
The elements of opposition in a population genetic story are, of course, genetic differences. Though dairy maid vs. marquise is more standard novel fare, genetics must focus on differences in our DNA. Fortunately there is plenty of genetic variation to assess, though much is undetectable without having your own Illumina MiSeq to sequence a genome or two. As discussed here, mitochondrial DNA is often used to trace relationships between groups of people. These mitochondrial mutations probably have little if any effect on our physiology. However by assaying these mutations in many different groups of people, we can trace how different populations flowed over time across the lands.